Litigation funding is a much needed, economically logical tool for many plaintiffs, and a fact of life. Indeed, it’s a fixture in some overseas countries, such as the Uk and Australia. But, the US Chamber of Commerce keeps flogging away at litigation funding. The latest exchange is here – a letter battle with Christopher Bogart of Burford Capital. Mr. Bogart is anything but an extreme plaintiff’s lawyer – he was a litigation partner at Cravath and later the GC at AOL-Time Warner. Once again, the chamber loses credibility by taking an extreme view without relevant, supporting facts. That’s too bad because there are other, bigger issues for which the loss of credibility will matter. Repeat players in litigation, such as the chamber, need credibility.
top of page
The Intersection Among Torts, Science, Corporate Law, Insurance & Bankruptcy
GlobalTort
Search
Recent Posts
See AllAs if to highlight my point about strategic lawsuits taking on more importance, this week ended with another voting machine company...
350
As noted on Monday, it seems there are more and more strategic defamation suits against media in the US. Perhaps the trend includes the...
260
It seems 2021 is going to be quite the year for strategic, defamation lawsuits against proven liars. The articles by lawyers are flowing....
270
bottom of page
Comments