top of page
  • Writer's pictureKirk Hartley

Guidelines for Molecular Testing for Lung Cancers

Lawyers litigating lung cancer cases will need increasing knowledge of mutations related to lung cancer, and their implications as to causation and treatment. Various professional medical groups issued April 2013 guidelines for molecular testing and targeted therapies for lung cancer. The guidelines are online and free at this page. The press release is online and pasted below:

Advances in Molecular Testing Offer New Hope for Lung Cancer Patients

Leading Health Care Organizations Issue Guideline Recommendations for Molecular Testing and Targeted Therapies

NORTHFIELD, ILL.— The emergence of molecular diagnostic testing in lung cancer offers new hope for

patients battling the number one cancer killer in the United States and abroad. Now, for the first time after a decade of biomarker testing in lung cancer, a uniform approach for testing for the EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement along with the availability of targeted therapies offer lung cancer patients the chance for improved quality of life and more time with their loved ones.

The College of American Pathologists (CAP), the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

(IASLC), and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) have developed an evidence-based

guideline, “Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for EGFR and ALK

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors,” which establishes recommendations for EGFR and ALK testing, helping to

guide targeted therapies. The guideline was released on April 3, 2013, in Archives of Pathology &

Laboratory Medicine (APLM), Journal of Thoracic Oncology, and The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics.

“The key recommendation of the guideline, and perhaps most important to lung cancer patients, is that all patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma should be tested for EGFR and ALK abnormalities, that

would qualify them for tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy, regardless of their clinical variables, such as

smoking history, gender, or ethnicity,” said Marc Ladanyi, MD, attending pathologist in the Molecular

Diagnostics Service at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, and IASLC member.

Similar to the testing done in breast cancer, matching a cancer patient’s molecular profile with the

appropriate targeted therapy provides individualized treatment options. The guideline answers important

clinical questions, including:

o When should testing be performed?

o How should testing be performed?

o Should other genes be routinely tested in lung cancer?

o How should molecular testing of lung cancer be implemented?

“In the U.S. up to 20 percent of patients with lung adenocarcinoma, the most common type of lung

cancer, will test positive for one of the two biomarkers,” said Philip T. Cagle, MD, FCAP, medical director

of Pulmonary Pathology in the Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine at The Methodist

Hospital in Houston, Texas, APLM editor, and CAP member. “It is critical to identify these patients

because they stand to benefit more from new targeted drugs than from conventional chemotherapy, and

with fewer side effects.”

For lung cancer survivor Richard Heimler, molecular diagnostic testing has meant five additional years

with his family, including his daughter and son. After his initial diagnosis in 2004, Heimler had surgery to

remove cancer tumors in his lungs and brain. When multiple tumors returned in 2008, Heimler

participated in a clinical trial to determine if he was a candidate for targeted therapies.

“After testing positive for the abnormal ALK gene, I began taking a targeted drug in the form of a pill,” said Heimler. “It was wonderful to not experience the debilitating side effects that I had with chemotherapy. This new world of science has given me hope that I will have more time to create memories with my children and watch them grow up.”

In an era of precision medicine, the guideline provides recommendations for pathologists, oncologists,

and other cancer health professionals on the current state-of-the-art recommendations for the molecular

testing of lung cancer.

“The three organizations came together to address the variance in practice around the world about how

this testing should performed,” said Neal I. Lindeman, MD, director of Molecular Diagnostics at Brigham

and Women’s Hospital and associate professor of Pathology at Harvard Medical School in Boston, and

AMP member. “Pathologists who specialize in molecular diagnostics and lung cancer collaborated to

create the guideline to minimize variation and provide greater precision in the care of patients.”

The CAP Pathology & Laboratory Quality Center, (the Center,) a forum for developing evidence-based

guidelines and consensus recommendations, provided the process for creating the guideline. Expert

panels made up of renowned worldwide leaders in the field collaborated to develop the


“The guideline is an important step in making sure that patients benefit from the new molecular

understanding of lung cancer,” said Dr. Ladanyi. “As new studies lead to further evidence-based

recommendations, we hope to develop additional guidelines for other biomarkers related to this disease.”

In conjunction with the publishing of the guideline, CAP, IASLC, and AMP have developed clinical tools

and resources for pathologists and oncologists that summarize the findings and recommendations. In

addition, the organizations have developed a patient guide for further understanding, including questions

for patients to ask their physicians. A series of videos featuring three of the guideline authors and a lung

cancer survivor can be found on the CAP, IASLC, and AMP YouTube Channels.


0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

The litigation industry is global. The latest example is the start of RoundUp/glyphosate litigation in Australia, as described in this June 3,  2019 article in the Brisbane Times.

bottom of page