Now online is the 1/3 fee petition from Hale v. State Farm. et al., # 3:12- cv-00660, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. As explained in an October 17, 2018 article in LAW360, the suit’s allegations assert thatState Farm “funneled millions into the campaign coffers of a candidate for an open seat on the [Illinois Supreme] court in order to buy his vote to overturn [a prior ruling] — and then lied about it in court filings, the suit claimed.” Unfortunately, the motion says nothing about what will or will not be done to make public the testimony and documents collected in discovery. That seems incongruous when the fee petitioners claim this case is important for the public.
top of page
The Intersection Among Torts, Science, Corporate Law, Insurance & Bankruptcy
GlobalTort
Search
Recent Posts
See AllAs if to highlight my point about strategic lawsuits taking on more importance, this week ended with another voting machine company...
350
As noted on Monday, it seems there are more and more strategic defamation suits against media in the US. Perhaps the trend includes the...
270
It seems 2021 is going to be quite the year for strategic, defamation lawsuits against proven liars. The articles by lawyers are flowing....
270
bottom of page
Comments