Class Actions/Aggregate Litigation

Class action law continues to evolve in Canada. This article  from McCarthy Tetrault provides a  link to and commentary on a recent and controversial appellate decision  approving  certification of an antitrust class involving DRAM chips.  Key excerpts are set out below:

"The DRAM litigation has been closely followed by specialists in the fields of class

I’m setting aside James Hardie and Australia for a few days. News on Friday provides a great springboard for some comments in the same general area of what’s new in mass tort resolution thinking, and some points related to corporate actions to cope with/avoid/limit the corporate damage from mass tort claims.
_____________________________________________________________________________

How does big tobacco admit it  faces massive global tort

Here is an unexpected but interesting non-asbestos example of conflict of interest issues arising from efforts to resolve “mass torts” for various persons around the world. The example arises from the airplane crash and airplane hijacking blamed on Libyan terrorists. The article describes a recently filed lawsuit in which two victims of the crash object

This post offers a brief comment arising from the now widely reported fact (see, for example, SCOTUSblog and many others) that the U. S. Supreme Court granted certiorari from the 2d Circuit’s opinion in the so-called foreign-cubed (a/k/a f- cubed) Rule 10b-5 securities case titled Morrison, et al., v. National Australia Bank, et al. (08-1191),

So, where and when are US tort and securities judgments binding on persons who live outside the US, and why should does it matter? Let’s start with the latter question – why does it matter. Suppose, for example, a US bankrupcty court purports to enter a global injunction that bars future asbestos claims that anyone