Twiqbal, Pleadings, and Subjectivity of Decisions on Accountant Scienter – A Review of the Out

Alison Frankel provided a helpful new post on the conclusions reached by business professors after a study of 144 federal court decisions on scienter in accounting class action cases. The conclusion?

"The law of pleading scienter against external auditors in (securities fraud) cases is so vague and inconsistent that, as a practical matter, judges have virtually unfettered discretion to reach any conclusion they deem appropriate."

See Alison’s post and links for all the specifics. One wonders when we will see similar studies on other groups of Twiqbal rulings. The financial industry certainly would be in much worse shape were it not for myriad Twiqbal rulings knocking out cases that plainly were adequately pleaded under the prior Conley v. Gibson standard.

#Securities

0 views

Recent Posts

See All

About Kirk

Since becoming a lawyer in 1983, Kirk’s over 30 years of practice have focused on advising a wide range of corporations, associations, and individuals (as both plaintiffs and defendants) on both tort and commercial law issues centered around “mass torts.”

Read More...

Copyright © 2020, GlobalTort All Rights Reserved.