Goldman Sachs Ripped – Again – This Time by the Top Judge in Delaware Chancery

Unlike lawyers and other professionals, investment banking firms are not bound by any kind of ethical code. Therefore, Goldman Sachs and others act accordingly. Here’s a link to one of many cogent summaries of the latest ripping of Goldman’s "ethics." The issues also are explored in an m & a conference.

This time the ripping lies in an opinion by the top judge in Delaware’s famed chancery court. Chancellor Strine is seldom bashful, but his El Paso opinion reveals fundamental disgust with Goldman’s actions. The interesting legal question is how long Delaware will give legal significance to "fairness opinions" rendered by banking firms rife with conflicts of interest and enormous financial stakes in achieving the outcome supported by the fairness letter. In tort law, courts do not allow expert opinions which are based on "junk science." One can fairly ask why Delaware chancery judges allow "junk opinions?"


Recent Posts

See All

About Kirk

Since becoming a lawyer in 1983, Kirk’s over 30 years of practice have focused on advising a wide range of corporations, associations, and individuals (as both plaintiffs and defendants) on both tort and commercial law issues centered around “mass torts.”


Copyright © 2020, GlobalTort All Rights Reserved.