top of page
  • Writer's pictureKirk Hartley

Chicagoans Contribute Facts to the Arguments About Caps on Medical Malpractice Recoveries

Some Chicagoans at Northwestern have contributed a factual study to the arguments back and forth about caps on medical malpractice claims.   The authors conclude that imposing caps on medical malpractice verdicts appears to encourage hospitals to reduce safety efforts.  The study is in SSRN. The abstract states:

“Abstract: A principal goal of tort law is to deter negligent behavior, but there is limited empirical evidence on whether it does so. We study that question for medical malpractice liability. We examine whether medical malpractice reforms affect in-hospital patient safety, using Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) – measures of adverse events developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality – as proxies for overall safety. In Difference-in-Differences analyses of five states that adopt caps on non-economic damages during 2003-2005, we find consistent evidence that patient safety generally falls after the reforms, compared to control states.”

2 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Who Knew: There is a Clinical Robotics Law Journal

The times they are a changing. The other day, I stumbled across the Clinical Robotics Law Journal, after being intrigued by a February 20, 2019  article titled:  The Healing Touch: Haptic Feedback and


bottom of page